Find a Lawyer

MISS SHAZIA BATOOL versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN

Pars 3, 4, 7, 10 and 23 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 22, 25 and 37 (C) admission to the educational institution Medical College District wise quota comprehension discrimination, the principle of complaint of the candidate was that the district wise The quota and reservation of seats for specific classes of students, as described in paragraphs 3, 4, 7, 10 and 23 of Bolan Medical College (2000) prospectus (2000) 2001, the legitimate status of the constitution based on comprehension discrimination There was a violation of the ban provisions. Must be rational and should be aligned with the goal of securing seats in medical colleges without any law justification for each district, which was neither natural nor natural. Was according to justice which was ordained by the holy. In the spirit of Article 25 of the prospect of the constitution of the Quran and the Sunnah, Bolan Medical College (2000 2001), a specific quota was allocated for each district, with no discrimination of seats in the ratio of 70 and 30 of And the district wise distribution will be valid when each district of Balochistan province is declared and notified by the government as a backward area division. There was no justification for allocating separate seats for the rural and urban districts of Quetta and Quetta for rural and quetta. There may be a political or other reason for the allocation of seats for each district of Balochistan but it is not based on the principle of classification. Was. The prospective quota in the prospectus had no alliance with real issues nor was it in the spirit of Arts 22 (4), and the general policy of allocating seats for each district of the 25th Constitution violated the law enacted by the Supreme. Was. Not to be based on court and discretion advocate for immigration from Kunjah lawyer