Find a Lawyer

FAROOQ MENGAL versus THE STATE THROUGH A.-G. SINDH, KARACHI

Section 497 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) bail, denial of judicial confession retracted by a co-accused, delay in trial of the accused due to the definition of evidence at the bail stage. The indictment alleges that he killed his wife. Through the co-accused, the co-accused recorded his judicial confession before the magistrate, saying that he had committed the murder of the deceased at the behest of the accused / applicant who had suspected illicit relations with his ex-husband's trial court. The High Court dismissed the bail application filed by the accused, saying that the incident could not be seen and that there was no direct or circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the crime, except for judicial confession retracted by the accomplices. Was. It has not yet been determined whether humanity was dead or not. That the questions regarding the true character of the confessional accused, whether invalid or pardoned, and his confession against the creator have not yet been confirmed in the context of their identification value and the matter against the accused in sub-section (2). Section 749 Cr, CRPC, therefore, is entitled to a waiver of bail. Questions must be withheld from a judicial or extra-judicial admission whether it is invalid or an excuse, the truth or a judicial confession, in the absence of evidence against the accused, On the basis of such irrefutable evidence that the possibility or the ultimate conviction of the offender was impossible, it could not be appreciated at the bail-out stage. The question regarding the admission price of the backward judicial admission is at the point of guarantee of the evidence test. top advocate from Pasni lawyer