Find a Lawyer

RAHIM TAHIR versus AHMED JAN

Article 3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The respondent was admitted to the premises with confession by a person who was neither the owner nor any legally constituted lawyer of the owner. Has the option to contract the sale. Obviously, giving the owner or possession of the property to the defendant is evident, the defendant's premises were unlawful and unauthorized occupation The dispute is that the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 did not apply to an unlawful occupant who had earlier. Was occupying the premises. In the date of the Act's issuance, there was no sense that it had not filed a case after the complaint was filed on the basis of a legal document, no consequence and importance for the protection of illegal and unlawful possession. Was. This law was meant to protect the right of possession of the legal owner or occupier and not to retain possession of the illegal occupants. As a result, the case was referred to the Sessions Court for judgment on merit by law. online advocate from Malakand lawyer