M.A. (AG) NO.562/LB OF 2006 AND I.T.A. NO.3350/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 26TH JUNE, 2006. versus M.A. (AG) NO.562/LB OF 2006 AND I.T.A. NO.3350/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 26TH JUNE, 2006.
The Appeal Tribunal provided for all the necessary details of section 24 (c) and 134 additions, which were acknowledged by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Officer, who was the author of the invalid order, no amount of money is allowed in any bald suit. There was no justification for the increase with the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
