Find a Lawyer

M.AS. NOS.494/LB OF 2004 AND 599/LB OF 2006, DECIDED ON 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2006. versus M.AS. NOS.494/LB OF 2004 AND 599/LB OF 2006, DECIDED ON 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2006.

Section 66A, 62 (1), 59 (4) and 156 deputy commissioner's inspection powers to inspect the deputy commissioner's self-assessment No order was approved until the expiration of the assessment year, no disqualification or Disqualification was not reported or processed later. The proceedings under section 62A of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, under Section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, were initiated under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and were declared when the Income Tax Ordinance, Section 62 of 1979. (1) The requirement to accept returns under section 59 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, was deemed to have been approved after income on the 30th day of the coming financial year; As a result of the fatal legal breakdown, two orders came into existence - one under section 62 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and the other under the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, Access was taken under the Ordinance. From the decree considered under section 59 (4) of the Tax Ordinance, 1979 and Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the legal error was that it was an order approved under section 62 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which Order under 62 was amended. The Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which was the subject of Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, had no legal existence in the presence of the order considered under the provisions of section 59 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The field did not legally require any other diagnostic order in the presence of such an order, which in turn was against the illegal illegal order resulting in action under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and A legal age behind this property advocates from Mehrab Pur lawyer