Find a Lawyer

ASIF MANZOOR MOHAL versus MUHAMMAD YAR MAMOONKA

Sections 39, 54, 7 (4), 70 (a), 8 (2) (1) and Representation of 68 people (holding election) Rules 1977, R 26 (29) Moving the election petition polling station to one Representation of the Representation Act, 1976 and Representation of the People (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 1977 Non-compliance and violation of the provisions of the Constitution, which was not legally notified, provided for the results of the Provincial Assembly elections by constitutional petition. Challenged, in which he believes that the votes cast in favor of other candidates received the highest number of votes, but the Returning Officer rejected the illegal and arbitrary vote. Based on two counts of incorrect calculation, the result was declared and the respondent was declared a candidate for violation. In the election scheme, the polling station was shifted to a location that was not reported, therefore, the applicant and the voters of the area were not aware of the transfer of the polling station. The Returning Officer did not issue a notice to the candidates seeking to contest the results of the counting of the 109 polling stations submitted by the Presiding Officers, especially the applicant or his election agents, therefore, he represented the People's Public Act 1976 Violated the provisions of section 39. The unanimous statement of the election results was prepared with the intention of Malala and counting the total number of voters in favor of the respondent / returning candidate was wrong as more was recorded and that the Returning Officer was in the open of the packet of ballot papers. Failed which was deleted. Representing the public in contravention of section 39 of the Public Act, 1976 (Int best law firms from Kallat lawyer