Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION versus HAJI KAHIR DIN

Sections 4, 11, 18, 23, 28 and 54 Punjab Land Rules, 1983, R 10 (1) (iii) (c) Determine the market value of the acquired land, the land referenced by the referee Price Increase The referee court, on which the landlord's request was referred, set aside the Land Acquisition Collector's search and increased the value of the acquired land, including sale of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Monitors registered sales deadlines in connection with similar land-based notifications. In this case, the Punjab Land Acquisition Rules were issued four months before the registration of Cell Dead Rule 10 (1) (iii) (c) of 1983, provided that the average market value of such land was based on the same price. Be true During the twelve months before the date of publication of the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the notification under section 4 of the Beekeeping Act 1894 had to be observed. N issued on 12 12 1985, the market value of such land, similarly located between 10 12 1984 to 9 12 1985, he could only consider it and thereafter 9 not 1985 notification. At no later cost, the referee court, in the circumstances, fell. Depending on the work registered in the legal proceedings, the determination of the rate of compensation of the acquired land was partially allowed, the results of the referee court amended and the landlords received Rs 28,667 instead of one thousand 33 thousand acres. Eligible to be paid per acre. From the date of occupation of the land acquired under Section 28 of the Act, and with the required acquisition compensation at the interest rate of 8% \ r \ n \ r \ n criminal advocate from Takhtbai lawyer