SANAULLAH versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
Section 497 (5) and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 324 pre-arrest bail, pre-arrest bail cancellation was granted to the defendant / accused on three important grounds. Previously, only one lackey was charged. Second, there was a backdrop of enmity between the parties. And third, that the most murderous crime was guaranteed pre-arrest before arrest, no rivalry or rivalry between the complaining party and the accused was brought on the record and by the complaining party There was no illicit desire or illicit record. Components for the grant of bail before the arrest of the accused for falsely implicating the accused in the case, in this case the case was very deficient, the acceptance of the bail before arrest and the completely different recovery on bail after the arrest. The accused was not yet charged. Although it was alleged that he was an old man of sixty-eight years, but he did not appear to be a weak or sick person, there was no basis for approval of my age warrant, the evidence of the documents was not kept on the record, which indicates it. Whether the suspect was suffering from a life-threatening illness. The offense with which the accused was charged fell under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1); the arrest against the CRPC accused was not pre-arrest warrant; order for the accused to be granted bail before arrest. Canceled after nomination
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer