Find a Lawyer

GHULAM AKBAR versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, DISTRICT BHAKAR

Subject to the agreement to sell the rejection of suit and appeal under section 42 and QQ law martyrdom (of 1984 of ten), Arts & 72 and 79 Su suit for declaration and alternatives to the specific performance of the contract. The concurrent findings of the following courts were challenged that the requirements of the Article Regulation were not fulfilled by the law testimony 1984, 1984, 1984, fulfilled 79. Law Sha Q should be considered in accordance with Article 72 of the Law Evidence Order, Law Law Law of Law is required and it is mandatory that possible evidence must be presented by the parties, in the best case, in the present case, There was basic evidence but said the documents were not produced by the plaintiffs, even though no such error was justified, but the evidence presented by the plaintiffs was not credible, rather than their testimony. Defendants' case was upheld, furthermore that the sale agreement was allegedly owned by an attorney who did not own the rights. S were patent advocate from Nooriabad lawyer