Find a Lawyer

HAMID ALI versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) / of 34 testimony was presented by the ocular account complainant who was the father of the deceased and by the other independent witness, the complainant suffered four injuries during the incident itself, at the time of the incident. His presence could not be ruled out was a resident of the area's complainant, and he stated that the prosecution's witnesses had no previous hostility or unlawful intent against the accused so as to impose false cash against them. Both statements stated that the prosecution's witnesses were consistent and that they had confirmed each other on all material points. Such witnesses were extensively examined, but the accuracy of their statements could not be ascertained. The medical evidence was fully supported and the delay in filing an FIR will be delayed in reporting the matter to the police. Do not adversely affect the prosecution's case, as there is no difference between a previous ill will or animosity, and the complainant and the accused, neither the complainant, nor the complainant have thrown too wide a net, Did not take the killer's replacement. The effect of the pension of the accused is known to the accused especially, so it cannot be said that the prosecution was rejected on the request of the accused defense taken by the accused not taken from the circumstances of the case, Under the circumstances, the case was proved. Without a doubt, the accused acted in a cruel manner that repeatedly hit the person's empty arm; there was no mitigating circumstance in favor of the defendant against the trial decision. family advocate from Kotli Loharan lawyer