Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HASSAN CHANNA versus SECRETARY, PAKISTAN CENTRAL COTTON COMMITTEE

Holiday Retirement Intelligence Civil Insurance, which has retired after attaining the age of employment, was entitled to the disclosure of the LPR in accordance with the Revised Leave Rules, 1980, but the LPR disclosure gave them Denied saying it was not approved. The authorized authority granted 365 days leave to the employee of the LPR instead of providing insurance. No reason was given for accuracy because LPR disclosure was not approved, the department claims that they were not disclosed to LPR due to poor record of services of public servants, but government In the absence of any strong cause by the Department for refusing to disclose the employee of the LPR for any misconduct, incompetence or for any other reason against the employee, under which it is subject to amended leave Was qualified under the Rules, 1980. The department was directed to pay 180 LPR employment disclosures to the department. when you need a advocate from More kunda lawyer