Find a Lawyer

TALAT QAMAR versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE AND ANOTHER

Reduction in Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (i) and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4, lower-level appellant, who was serving as Senior Preventive Officer. Was imposed on a major conviction. After scrutinizing the charge sheet and conducting inquiries against them for duty neglect, the Chief Justice of the Inquiry Officer reduced the time scale to a fact sheet instead of a regular inquiry. There is no penalty for Ben. On the basis of the facts, the inquiry report was also inquired by the inquiry officer in a question and answer form which was not valid in law. The inquiry was invalid and invalid and the order was not to speak in invalid order as the defendant did not mention the period in the order disappearing. For which there will be an indefinite punishment. Proven that no irregularities, mismanagement and negligence were established against the appellant The inquiry report stated that nothing specific was proved against the appellant, but nevertheless the appellant W. as corrupt. Was set up, in which case the principles of natural justice were also violated, in the circumstances the order of disappearance was set aside and the appellant was restored from the date of the disappointing order with all concessions. top advocate from Kamra lawyer