Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM LAKHWERA versus CHIEF SECRETARY, PUNJAB, LAHORE

RR 4 (1) (b) (i), 6 and 7 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), after conducting a charge sheet on section 4 appellants and conducting their investigation against the charges against them. Reduces five steps in the current pay scale. Some irregularities in the allotment of certain property have been made, in this regard governmental guidelines / policy were violated and in addition to the jurisdiction, a complaint was filed against the appellants which started this. It is alleged that illegal / fraudulent allotment of the premises was made by the appellant. Appellants were allotted sites under questions without obtaining approval from the respective district collector and in doing so, the appellant violated the government directive and acted beyond their jurisdiction and they were appellants. It was recommended to impose a large fine on which the inquiry officer was transferred after presenting the report after which the inquiry proceedings were handed over to the other inquiry officer. The other inquiry officer said nothing was fresh and the appellants' statements. The record of their predecessor and authority after the record was heard The report was endorsed, in response to a question from the service tribunal that the department representative admitted that the land allotted by the appellants was referred to as state land encroachment and he further admitted that the Colony Assistants In his capacity, the appellants were authorized to make allotments under the relevant provisions of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act 1912 which gave the appellant the authority to make such allotments. list of supreme court advocates from Ghizer lawyer