Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR AND ANOTHER versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB AND OTHERS

(1) (b) Employee dismissal irresponsible liability On the charge of wheat shortage, public servants were punished for their termination of employment and the order of recovering the price of wheat was approved by the Government employees. The source department maintained that the service tribunal pledged that they had been awarded a huge dismissal on the basis of duty recognition, a huge wheat shortage was not shown in the records of the Pakistan Railway Center by the government employees. As a result of the physical examination, and the only question will be whether this gun There is a matter of shortage of root or lack of center after shipment. Wheat quantity was the result of waste due to short delivery of goods or waste in transit, a fact will be presented. Given that Pakistan Railway Center has suffered shortages, therefore, it cannot be considered a short delivery case, no exemption can be taken by the service tribunal in search of the responsibility of the government employees' department. The services were rigorous and instead the mandatory retirement punishment would be enough to cover the end of justice. The Supreme Court received the dismissal from the employment of civil servants by turning it into compulsory retirement with the direction that it could be incurred in the event of loss of government. The terms of the jurisdiction order will be submitted by the public servants within three months. The Supreme Court has also directed that if the damages claimed by the Pakistan Railway Department are finally paid to the government. divorce advocates from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer