PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION, THROUGH MD, KARACHI versus NADEEM MURTAZA KHAN
Article 212 ()) Termination of Service Principles of natural justice were condemned for not listening to them, which prompted the authorities to demand that the appointment was on political considerations and violated the rules. It was not enough to set an order to abolish the issuance of a show cause notice, which should not be heard by anyone and if an order against the interest of a person went behind his back and he should hear such an order. Was illegal without providing the opportunity to serve an individual in an organization in the absence of specific rules, before any action was taken. In respect of their terms and conditions of service, they were entitled to a hearing in the league, instead of abolishing the service of employees from the principles of natural justice, the proper way for the authorities was to provide it. Issue a notice of reason and make an inquiry to find out about his fitness so that he can be retained on the job. Disregarding the organization's service principles and violating the principles of natural justice, it was declared illegal and no exception could be reached to the decision of the service tribunal, thereby, to terminate the employee's service. The order was. Put aside and reinstated, the Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Miran Shah lawyer