Find a Lawyer

AFZAL versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 337a (ii), 337f (ii), 337l, 148 and 149 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 85 (3), the recourse to proof, the propriety of the evidence to be recovered by two courts. The accused party attacked and charged the accused party with forming an unlawful assembly with all the deadly weapons, and the prosecution's witness trial court sentenced the two accused to death, but the high court changed the sentence to life imprisonment. It is unclear who the defendant and the prosecution's witnesses were individually responsible for causing specific injuries to the defendant's witnesses. Jabat Waswas, charged with liability, was equally responsible for the murder of the deceased and, due to injury to the prosecution's witnesses, the High Court concluded that it was a liability charge and individual role. Matter. Could not find out, the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident was a bright day and the eyewitnesses constantly described the active participation of all the suspects in the incident and nothing was brought on the record so there was little doubt about their crime. Could be done. The accused accused failed to convince that either the eyewitness testimony of the injured eye was not credible or that the suspects' participation was suspected of the fact that the High Court had sought the intervention of the accused in the High Court verdict. Do not read any false statement or evidence by the trial court or the High Court, without drawing any conclusions about the crime or any other legal or factual weakness. Was denied top advocates from Karachi lawyer