Find a Lawyer

MIAN GHULAM YASIN versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD

Section 152 (1) (2) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005, R14 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The selection of the Nazim and the deputy of the Nazim are the automatic disqualifications of the nominee candidates as the same Union Council. Union Nazim `and` Deputy moderator are contesting in the panel, under law, they could not exercise the authority of the Chief Election Commissioner, which could not be denied to the Chief Election Commissioner. Scope Petitioners jointly contested local and parliamentary seats in the panel for the moderator, and they were declared retired candidates. Because he only has Sanad. The religious seminary of the Matriculation Certificate was not the same as the Election Tribunal when it was constituted and the defendants also set up a central-based electoral petition stating that the applicant was not matriculated, therefore, he was given the Senate of During the proceedings proceedings the Election Tribunal directed the Returning Officer to ensure the safe production of records. For the purpose of counting which order was challenged by the applicant by constitutional applicants, the applicant's notification was canceled during the approval of the constitutional petition and an order for fresh election for his vacant seat. After that, a respondent filed a review petition before the Member Election Commission claimed that other applicants were also slapped because both parties immigration advocates phone number from Balakot lawyer