Find a Lawyer

KABIR AHMED versus SAUDABAD TRUST THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE, KARACHI

Articles 42 & plain 54 The case for the plaintiff's claim and permanent injunction was that the Administrator, the Municipal Committee issued an allotment order in respect of the under house, and the rent was deducted from his salary. Denied that the defendant cannot ask the plaintiff to vacate the said house. The plaintiff has obtained the right to rent under a letter issued by the Trial Administrator Trial Court, but the appellate court, setting aside the judgment and injunction administrator's municipal committee, said that there was no allotment in respect of the property. The issuer of the order or even the licensee has no right to the law. Admittedly the trust never applied for a suit house allotment to the plaintiff's property, but only sought permission to occupy it, which the Administrator's Letter of Permission had clearly stated that the plaintiff on his transfer. The suit will be responsible for evacuating the house. , Development, dismissal, retirement or at any time he will be required by the authority to issue a similar case without notice because the plaintiff himself approached the court for a declaration and injunction dismissing his house, Therefore, the plaintiff had to claim that he had some right in the law that should be protected by the court. He had no right to the law; he could not refer to the court seeking protection from the appellate court below, based on the record of the case and the trial court's decision and ruling below, without exception. Was not open for Especially when causing misunderstandings of justice attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hasilpur lawyer