Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUSHTAQUE ALIAS RAJA YOUNIS versus STATE

Sections 302, 307, 381 and 454 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), section 13 (d), which was fully accredited to the accused involved, were cross-examined, but this During the cross-examination, there were no complaints which had no purpose. Against the defendants, it was found credible because the evidence was not brought to the record in any way to defame it, the prosecution's witness fully supported the complainant's evidence, the exception's testimony also proved credible. It happened because it was not shaken during the cross examination and nothing was brought on the record. This witness was wrongly discharged for some ulterior motive or unclean motives. The evidence of the complainant and the prosecutor's testimony was aided by Kalashnikov's four privileges and medical evidence; the defendant's conviction could be based on credible and convincing evidence. Full supporting evidence of litigation cases such as the recovery of vacancies and the dead body S also supported the prosecution complainant's case and the prosecution's witnesses identified the accused in the identification test in which the crime was committed. As was mentioned in the FIR, without a doubt, the FIR was lodged, which contained the necessary details, the prosecution proved beyond any doubt, the accused was convicted by the trial court and An appeal against the sentence was dismissed Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shedani sharif lawyer