Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL RAZZAK THROUGH ATTORNEY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD

Section 195 (1) (c) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 403, 406, 420, 471, 475 and 476 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for certain offenses relating to documents in evidence Fodder is needed. Article 195 (1) (c), satisfied before seeking the provisions of the CCP, was the CCP's allegation that the allegation was made in a court proceeding by a party alleging the offense Was made in connection with the document and said that the crime had fallen. Under either section 63, 63, 1 47 47, 5 476 or 6 47 disp, the PPC copies of the controversial letters were kept on record, while clause (c) of section 195 (1), the CCP, contained the original document. Considered or produced copies of the evidence or did not copy it and charged the bank petitioner with fines under Sections 406 and 420, PPC, for fraud and fraud. While section 463 was not attracted to the PPC complaint order. The Special Court (in connection with the banks) had clearly disclosed that the complaint was filed under Section 1953 (1) (c), PPC Bar, CRCC, sections 403 and 420, in the general parties. In the civil case, the evidence and the verdict are generally not implemented, cannot be applied to anyone else, nor can be used as evidence in a criminal case; the cases involved in civil and criminal cases vary by the parties. Evidence was decided on the evidence. advocates from Tando Jam lawyer