DR. MUNIR AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Constitution Petitioner The applicant was a professor in various colleges with a PhD degree and taught science / social science subjects. The petitioner's complaint was that the special science and technology allowance given to him was stopped at the instruction of the right accountant of Punjab. Holding a Higher Qualification and PhD Degree which was intended to provide such allowance, was a benefit / benefit to those who had achieved high qualification and a PhD separation in the relevant subject / field. In the beginning, university PhD professors / lecturers and all other colleges were also considered to be entitled to such allowance and were paid a patent that had a PhD degree, as well as different letters. The chairman was pleased with the Higher Education Commission. The government was also entitled to benefit from the PhD level faculty member / college institute ions from science and technology allowance. That was the reason that the word institution was mentioned in the history of 8 8 2002, under which this allowance was granted, such view of the colleges within its jurisdiction was in accordance with the reasoning. And the logic behind the grant of such allowance, ie, the high qualification ie PhD degree, motivates those who have attained high qualification and excellence in the relevant subjects to prevent such allowance from applicants for the purposes of preventing such allowance. Was based on a wrong view. The approval of such allowance, which could not maintain the Circular of the Accountant General of Punjab, under which the allowance was withheld to the applicants, had no legal effect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
