Section 12 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), the suit for specific performance of the section 52 agreement, was simultaneously rejected by the trial court, and the appellant's affirmation by the appellate court was that the question / sale agreement Implementation of the document, but on this aspect of the case, the appellant's court did not consider acquiring rights in the suit property during the litigation, in which case the principle of Les Pendins would apply, which is the basic aspect of the case. Reach out The decisions and decisions of the lower courts could not be sustained after the consideration by the courts below, the same matter was set aside and after hearing the two sides, the appellate court had to decide the matter. Remand was called, accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
