Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus STATE

Article 302 (b), 316 and 315 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 544 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance, 1972, Section 3 (2) Intra-Court of Appeals Diet by the High Court Criminal Appeal During the judgment rendered, the applicant / accused was convicted under section 230b (b), PPC under trial for maintaining the constitutional application against the High Court finding in the criminal appeal. In effect, he was sentenced to life imprisonment for paying legal wages of up to 30,000 rupees. The Late High Court, in addition, filed an appeal, stating that as soon as the applicant / accused was found guilty under Section 315, PPC, section 302 (b), sentenced under PPC. And the applicant has been sentenced to life imprisonment as an influence. Not Applicable The applicant's offender was changed from section 2b2 (b) to section 161616, PPC and sentenced to ten years in prison. A legal application of Rs 1,89,906 was filed to the legal heritage of the applicant related to the Dait, so that after completing his sentence he would be released from custody and directed the chairman of the provincial and central Baitmal. Let him pay the money to the legal heirs. In view of the financial status of the applicant, the motif was dismissed by the Constitutional Appeal High Court and the applicant filed an intra-court appeal against the finding of a judge of the circle, which led to the High Court receiving the money. That the Constitutional petition was not against the High Court law websites from Kotla Pathan lawyer