MUHAMMAD AKHLAQ MEMON versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Article 3 (3) Auction non-possession of auction was the highest bidder for the purchase of a petition at auction conducted by the Capital Development Authority, with the applicant accounting for 1% of the bid amount. 1999, 000,000,, 000,000 / / year deposited but the authority applicant's position was that the Capital Development Authority is obliged to respect this commitment and abide by these terms and conditions. Which was proposed by the public auction to dispose of the land for fair, equitable and equitable work. The Capital Development Authority held that the applicant himself had entered a memorandum of appeal before the High Court, not pursuing the process of constitutional petition filed by Zat and not pursuing the court on vacancy and quietly. The court said that even though the authority was willing to refund it, the Supreme Court refused to accept the same leave of appeal for consideration of questions raised by the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
