Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (RTD.) KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AND OTHERS versus ZILA COUNCIL

R8 (2) (3) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 233 Export Tax, District Council's Denial of Contractor's Securities to the Applicant on behalf of the District Council on the Increase of Time for Contractor's Lease Expense Denying the applicant an application to pay a fine equal to eleven times the amount charged, was that after the lease term granted to the contractor was terminated, the District Council was responsible for paying the fine as its principal. Is cured. After the termination of the lease agreement and after a period of more than two days, the applicant did not have the jurisdiction to decide the matter, not in the relevant quarter, after accepting the overcharge. Was, after the lease agreement was terminated, the Securities Contractor District Council was released to recover the fines as the land revenue action against the contractor contractor was authorized by the District Council to receive export tax, and Applicant may file his claim against the District Council, but he may be required to submit a claim by the bounding officer. The contractor did not join the contract with the contractor as part of the penalty amount. Unmanaged order maintained under conditions \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer