Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus NAZIR AHMED

Article 199 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R 19 Constitutional jurisdiction The High Court had substituted the decision of the High Court, pending the decision by the Board of Revenue Authorities and the High Court in exercising constitutional jurisdiction. Revenue decision postponed. There was nothing available on record to the respondent who was classified and designated as a lambarder, which shows no reason for disqualifying the applicant from his appointment because the limbardar does not replace constitutional jurisdiction with the priorities of the competent authorities. Unless it can be. The authority under Article 199 of the Constitution suffered any jurisdictional error or any unlawful High Court decision by the competent authorities, which cannot be settled in appeals to such decisions or decisions. There are scope respondents. The case, in the view of the National High Court, was a better choice but it could not be because the High Court could not be allowed to declare the Board of Revenue's decision illegal unless it was disclosed that the District Collector and The selection made by the Board of Revenue goes ahead. Illegal or illegal considerations that were not found by the High Court's jurisdiction which was not sustained by the High Court in keeping with the Board of Revenue decision, the Supreme Court could change the application for leave to appeal. And sets aside the decision passed by the High Court of Appeals. Was allowed family advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer