ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DIRECTORATE GENERAL (PROCUREMENT) ARMY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE versus MESSRS SHEIKH MUHAMMAD SADIQ MUHAMMAD AFZAL THROUGH PROPRIETOR
Sections 41, 42, 24 and 63 Acceptance of Goods by Buyer on the Supply Inspection of Supplies Release of certain Goods after a one-year interval for delivery of goods shows Sections 41 and 42 of the Goods for Sale Act, 1930 Whether the inspection / inspection site was to be taken as a place of supply and if there was a defect in the goods, it was an appropriate opportunity to be delivered within a reasonable time. The inspection of the goods did not mean for an unlimited period after which the goods were accepted on inspection, after which the goods could not be sold because the seller is of the view that the goods were accepted on inspection if After about a year's supply, anything can be recovered. The Art Act, was caused by error, negligence or negligent handling by the buyer, was not without substance, so the suit for the restoration was the case, in which the Constitutional Court correctly ruled the appeal. Was. ts Appeal Jurisdiction \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
