MST. SAKINA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR ALIAS MUJAHID
In order to qualify for certified testimony of Arts 17 (2) (a), 79 and 129 (g), the script states that there is no restriction on the statement of the author to the executioner Can never be understood as , But it is subject to two very basic conditions, ola-ly, that the author should have signed the document as a witness, and if it had not been, the document must be substantiated when it The document was implemented. , He was present and witnessed the execution not only of the executioners, but also of the required number of witnesses to be confirmed, that the witnesses, whom the parties had purposely selected as corroborating witnesses. In the event of a dispute about it. In practice, they will testify on its behalf, but due to circumstances beyond the parties' control, it is inevitable and cannot be examined; in addition to fulfilling the other condition, it will be unlawful for a party to inspect the author. As a substitute for a certifying witness, which will not be considered a witness in accordance with the provisions of Article 79, it will have consequences as well as the principle of withholding the best evidence against the party who is determined. Can be attracted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
