Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Section 498 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 381 pre-arrest bail, the defendant's grant, who was the employee of the complainant, was considered expert in cultivating the fish, the accused started the complainant's business, but no No salary or compensation was found. When the FIR was lodged against the accused, he left the complainant's form. The accused confessed that he was involved in the case and because of this he could not compile the complaint, interim pre-arrest bail was granted against the accused, the judge through additional sessions, but he was still on bail. , Was arrested and placed in illegal prison for one day, charged, in circumstances not only by the police but also by the complainant co-accused, who resembled him, showed Malala evil. Was able to do. The role, once the bail was granted after the arrest, could not be denied to the accused, even in the arrest warrant, the accused was accused of having stolen 500 tonnes of fish from the accused. It was not possible that the accused could have stolen such a large quantity of fish without any transportation, there was no record of one year and one month delay on the record, which was charged with filing an FIR offense. Hadn't come in. Section 497, the CRPC prohibited clause, was entitled to a discount on pre-arrest bail in the situation, the interim bail granted to the accused was confirmed, in the circumstances best law firm from Kumbh lawyer