ALLAH BAKHSH FOODGRAIN SUPERVISOR (RETD.) versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND OTHERS
Rr 4 (b) and 8 Damage Recovery Maxim: Apply Audi Ultram Partum: A government inquiry was launched against a civil servant on the charge of reducing wheat reserves, the government did not prove damages during the inquiry. And the results of such inquiry were obtained by the inquiry officer. Authorized officer endorsed, but top officials fined government employee for damages The Validity Inquiry Officer did not recommend damages against the civil servant and if the authority wants to exercise its powers under R8 (Capacity and Discipline) Rules, 1975, it was stable that the record was available Depending on the facts, the exact reasons or the conclusions of the law should have helped to arrive at a conclusion that the public servant was responsible for the loss. Damage recovery was not based on sound reasons and was not maintained in the eyes of the law The principle of natural justice heard in violation of a public servant, the maximum limited: Audi Ultimatum Partem Supreme Court Approved the leave application in the appeal, set aside the orders passed by the service tribunal and departmental authorities and directed the authorities to appeal the return of damages received from the public servant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Blitang lawyer