Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IDRIS KHAN versus SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD

Section 3 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R2 (4) Dismissal of the Department of Inquiry Act, dismissed from service, employed by a public servant The dismissal was made without a formal inquiry into the letter writing to the Minister, alleging corruption and misappropriation of government funds by the designated officers, which was submitted by the public servant against the order dismissing the public servants. Had to write There was no action for mismanagement of the Minister. The letter sent by the civil servant was not valid and despite the accuracy of the allegations contained in it, it was a misdemeanor process that could not be approved and not tolerated. Was because the civil servant was not treated fairly because he was awarded the honorable award. Exemption from employment without proper investigation should not be a public servant except under special circumstances Extraordinary circumstances of demanding the exchange of inquiries for a substantial fine of dismissal without proper investigation and giving him a reasonable opportunity to explain his position. Absent, summary proceedings, and without prejudice will suggest an element of prejudice and unfair treatment on major penalties for dismissal. In terms of the amount of punishment, the Supreme Court changed the leave application to appeal the appeal and changed the dismissal sentence to censorship in the slightest fine and instructed the authorities to provide the government employee with all Restore employment with greater benefits. best advocate from Qazi Ahmed lawyer