Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus STATE

Section 302 Definition of Evidence Although the two eyewitnesses were related to the defendant, they did not have any hostility or illicit desire from the accused so that one of the witnesses was an immediate neighbor of the accused and also the complainant. Cross was examined nearby, but his reality could not be shaken. Nothing was on record to prove that the relationship between the prosecution witnesses and the accused was strained, the incident was reported in the light of the day, within an hour the matter was reported to the police and the victim's post The autopsy was performed. In that date, the possibility of fraudulent reporting to the police immediately and an immediate post-mortem examination also ruled out the statements, the statements of both witnesses were fully supported by the medical evidence and were regularly confirmed. And there was no reprehensible motive available on the record. There was only one reason on the record why the complainant would substitute his killer. The truth of the testimony of the witnesses with an innocent person is evident from the fact that they did not identify the fatal bullets to the co-accused. After he was kidnapped and declared to be a fugitive through the operation of the law, the accused's infidelity provided evidence. The suspects were acquitted, giving them the benefit of the doubt because one of the co-accused was empty-handed and the other accused did not kill the defense plea taken by the accused before the trial court, not just opposing common sense. But there was a prosecution later. Mills via ocular version female advocates from Pirpai lawyer