SULTAN versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 427, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 bail, did not designate additional investigative company's employee's grant in the FLR Even in the implicit statement, it was not guilty of any kind and the co-accused is said to be a close relative of the main accused and the possibility of lying to the co-accused in the face of enmity between the parties. Could not be ruled out, to the extent of the co-accused, it was a matter of further inquiry into the felony of the co-accused, the fact that against him under section init87 / 88 No action was initiated, the co-accused was behind bars after his arrest, otherwise, the refusal to bail on the basis of a felony was a matter of personal status and practice, if a further investigation came up. Then the accused will be entitled to bail and in such case bail was not granted by bail or exemption. The trial does not begin. Bail to the E-court accused, if further investigation comes up. So the co-accused was released on bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khuzdar lawyer