Find a Lawyer

QAISAR ALI KHAN versus REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF SINDH AND ANOTHER

Section 3B Adjournment Remarks Appeal Extraordinary Reaction Was Permanently Recorded In AC The Appellant's (judicial service) contingent opinion on appellant's constitutional integrity was taken and several serious allegations were made and He was unable to establish any disease. To report such remarks was misconceived by the reporting officers or intended to be, in view of its conduct / performance, the comments made by the Reporting Officer on negative comments made under the challenge, obviously That there were enough reasons to form such an opinion. It has been mentioned that despite the consultation there was no improvement in his behavior / performance. Appellant's view that a particular incident was not cited by the reporting officer, was not a negative comment, it was clear that cases such as demolition of property by cases involving police officer pending cases and bar n. Complaints made by senior members of the KDP and the judges were quoted as saying that the reporting officer's delay in recording negative comments will not affect their usefulness or legal status. Apart from the proper hearing and proper consideration by the Chief Justice, the representatives presented by him were given the opportunity of a personal hearing. Disposal of Representations After considering and personally hearing the representation, the order passed by the Authority / Chief Justice was rejected, which was fair, equitable and legally valid, as well as any intervention. Not demanded. advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer