Find a Lawyer

UMEED ALI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Article 17 and Schedule I, Article 1 Sindh Finance Ordinance (VII of 1977), Section 2 Sindh Finance Act (IV 1990), Sections 4 and 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A & 37 (d) Miscellaneous suit more The question brought in reference to the High Court's determination of the end of social justice to the Court of Common Pleas to maintain a case over a court-payable payment, despite the amendment of the Court Fees Act, 1870 by section 4, The maximum fee was in the case of having different cases with different subjects. And there was no change in position, rejecting the first amendment to Article 1 of Schedule 1 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, as provided by section 2 of the Sindh Finance Ordinance 1977, 6 of the Sindh Finance Act 1990 In the case of receiving judicial fees in the suit, reference to Articles 2A and 37 (d) of the Constitution was also appropriate, hence the state is bound to promote the elimination of social justice. Was. According to SCMR 683 of 1993, following the guidelines of the Supreme Court in relation to Aslam Industries (Pvt) Khanpur v. Pakistan Edible Corporation and other titles, all the questions proposed in the reference were answered positively. Are. According to the full bench immigration advocates contact from Neelam lawyer