Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SACHAL versus STATE

Clauses 302, 364 and 34 of the definition of evidence have the benefit of doubt as to the three pieces of evidence in the prosecution's case. (i) The deceased was last seen alive in the company of the accused. (ii) the search of the body on the identification of the accused; and (iii) the confession of the accused persons for more than 12 days between the accused and his last victim, who died; It was required that during the 12-day period, the deceased was with the accused because the deceased was not killed immediately; the victim was seen in the company of the accused. It was possible that the deceased had left the accused in the case of a 12-day period, in which case the prosecution had failed to prove a piece of said evidence about the discovery of the bodies, the evidence in this regard being all the accused Disagree with And the place of recovery of the dead body. His evidence was also denied by the Medical Officer Prosecution; in the circumstances it was not proved that beyond any reasonable doubt against the accused, a piece of evidence was stated by the complainant about the accused's confession. , That the police mistreated and beaten the accused, then confessed to their crime and voluntarily disclose the confession to identify the place where the deceased was buried. This was sufficient because the accused did not make voluntary confessions through the trial court to seek clarification. The evidence was not framed in front of the accused, for the negligence of not providing profane evidence on the accused in violation of the provisions of section 2 342, the CCPC said. lawer from fb area from Domeli lawyer