MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ versus STATE
The respondents of Sections 177 and 193 of the Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sections 197, 435 and 476, confessed that the information provided by them was due to misunderstanding and had violated Section 193, P.P.C. Also offered unconditional amnesty provisions that were dealt with. An inaccurate proof was not applicable in this case as it did not, but in this case, Section 177, the PPC, which deals with providing false information, stated that the respondents had submitted their response saying that it was false. Due to the misunderstanding, the message was not really understood, they submitted a false certificate to the Adel Sessions Judge regarding the High Court Approved Order in the Constitutional Petition, the Respondent has made an unconditional apology, Further, considering all these facts, he was admitted to the new profession, the request was dealt with observation. That respondent was strictly warned to be cautious in the future i No further action was demanded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Risalpur lawyer
