DILSHAD AHMED KHAN versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Sections 42, 54 and 55 of the auction, the declaration of the permanent and mandatory injunction canceling the auction of the auction auction authority's bid The suit plot and the plaintiff were the highest bidder The terms of the auction show that the plaintiff had some at the time of auction. Had paid the money. According to the auction terms, the claimant was obliged to submit 25% of the total consideration within 48 hours from the day of the auction, in which the failed bid would be rejected and the total premium amount or deposit amount, whichever was less. Will stand. Failure to submit 25% of the total consideration within the stipulated 48-hour period, according to the auction terms, was seized in favor of the plaintiff of the auction, whose auction was canceled. The terms could not be deposited, as two days after the auction of the plot, a person filed a case against the plaintiff and the authority. And this case was issued by the civil court in the case, which issued an order directing the authority to refrain from separating the suit plot illegally, in this case the orders passed by the civil court. The plaintiff was prevented from depositing the balance anywhere. According to the auction terms, considering the 25% of the total sale, as the appellant did not deposit 25% of the sale consideration within the 48-hour period, the highest bid submitted by the plaintiff was the authority. Was rightfully rejected and not certified in favor of acceptance. Plaintiff's high bid that was not accepted, no legal right to contract was made in favor of the plaintiff The plaintiff also rejected or canceled her bid.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
