Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN ALIAS MAMDAL versus STATE

As witnesses in statements under Section 491 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/34 bail, two-time complicity of the complainant and his brother under section 161, the PC has accused and his accomplice The accused was charged with effective firing. Eyewitnesses identified the suspect and his co-accused in the light of the complaint on the complainant, and his voice would not be attributed specifically to any of the two suspects as the suspect's case was being investigated. And medical evidence will not be recovered as a crime. There is evidence of a supporting prosecution case whose record is the alleged fax-related crime, which came under the scope of the prohibition clause of section 497, CCP Bell was denied in the circumstances. top civil advocates from Rahwali lawyer