Find a Lawyer

DEPUTY ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN REVENUES NORTHERN AREAS versus DR. SHAHBUDDIN, RADIOLOGIST, D.H.Q. HOSPITAL GILGIT

AXXVII, R 8 (2), OI, R 3 Section 79 Constitution read with Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application suit against a government officer joining party employees of Health Department by the competent authority department The approval of the advance increments refused to include the increments, the constitutional petition against the department in the applicant's salary slip was granted, without imposition of the party government, which was undoubtedly the work of the federal government and part of the department. On refusing, the applicant's salary was to include four advance increments in the slip. In his official capacity a petition was filed against the Deputy Accountant General of Pakistan Revenue, no application was made by the Government Applicant O XXVII, R 8 (2), CPC, so it is evident that the application. Action is taken as if it is a request between the private parties federal. The government was an essential party under the circumstances but in the process of hearing it was to be given to the provisions of section 79, CPC under the federal government or the provincial government, but this work was illegal under the jurisdiction of the court. The Constitution was not filed in its official capacity and in which Pakistan was not enforced because the party court was always very enjoyable. The decision has been remanded after a party has the power to add or strike a party at any stage of the application or otherwise enforce the parties required by law. best law firms from Bolan lawyer