Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL MUNAWAR versus SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Article 199 Constitution Petition for Civil Service Advance increments and refunds from applicants 'salaries in the form of deductions or refunds The applicants' complaint is that through a notification issued by the Treasury Department, the pursuit of higher educational qualification Due to the applicants two short fall advance increments, the applicants were instructed to deduct salaries, the applicants alleged that the letter from the Provincial Ombudsman on the basis of recommendations made in the proceedings / The notification was issued in which there were no applicants They never heard that the petitioner's request was that irregular payments made by the competent authority for the services of government employees could not be deducted from the salary of the latter under the principle of Lux Penitentia. , The complaints raised by the applicants were never submitted. The relevant responsible administration had assured the Additional Advocate General that if the unidentified notification violated any of the applicant's legal rights, a dispute could be raised by the applicants even earlier. Counsel for the competent petitioner had agreed to approach the authorities on the stipulated terms of the Additional Advocate General Petitioners. In the circumstances, it was directed that they file their representation before the representatives who will listen to the applicants and decide their objections strictly in accordance with the law within the stipulated time period. The recording will go until the controversial shortcut f famous high court advocate from Daska lawyer