Find a Lawyer

SAADAT IQBAL versus MST. HAFEEZ BEGUM ALIAS MST. FAIS HAYAT AND ANTHER

Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), pursuant to section 12 (2), set aside the recording of the wrong statement, and agreed to recover a square of land recovered from Dover's wife, according to the statement of the husband. , The pen was closed, she confessed to the decision of the suit but then the husband filed an application under section 12 (2) CPC on the matter that his statement was not properly recorded. It is based on an order in which it was agreed to sell not one square but two canal land. The husband was not denied and there is no reason not to come forward as to why the wife presented in the court proceedings did not appear as a witness and why her lawyer did not give the Advocate Court statement. Witnesses appeared in the box to dismiss. The duty was to record the statement correctly, and if it was not done, it was an act which, without the jurisdiction and without any legal authority, could not be a party. The same High Court should be punished for re-amending jurisdiction, which rejects a case passed in favor of the wife and remands the case to family court so that she can proceed. \ r \ n \ r \ n property advocate from Kasur lawyer