Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED versus SYED MUHAMMAD SHAH

Arts 199 and 185 ()) for the sale of non-running script by respondent / corporation print media for non-approval of the bid due to the scope of the constitutional application before termination of the High Court maintenance tender The invited bidder was the highest bidder, but instead of accepting the corporation, rejecting their bid, the tenders of the removed tenderers considered the constitutional petition before the High Court and said that the corporation accepted their bid. Has acted irresponsibly and disobediently and accepted such a constitutional request No reason to refuse refused to issue a letter of award applicants without assignment. With no legal authority and no corporation without a corporation, it was announced that there was only an offer to supply something that did not meet the proposal and the corporation did not accept it. There was no contractual agreement between them. Parties; that the applicants had not obtained any legal or their right to enforce before the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Since no legal right has been accumulated in favor of the applicants, they cannot be said to be victims of the scope of expression used in Article 199 and that the constitutional petition was not viable. Whether the High Court was legally justified. And had a legal obligation to exercise its jurisdiction to enforce the claimant's rights of applicants and best law firm from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer