Find a Lawyer

SYED ASHFAQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus N.E.D. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI

Section 4 NED University of Engineering and Technology Act (III of 1977), Sections 28 (iv), 38 and 46 (1) (a) NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Employees (Eligibility and Discipline) ) Constitution, 1990, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 188 and 212 (3) Revision of Supreme Court Decision Retired Retirement Scope Departmental Appeal Under Strict and Compulsory Service Appeal Not Excluded Due to Service Tribunal Not Reasonable by Reasonable and Relevant Case Laws Not Decision Referring to the fact that the applicant is an employee of the University, the Vice-Chancellor quotes Yrmnt submitted a request to retire at 16 2002 12 2002 act, which was accepted, the applicant was allowed to retire at 10 years and 25 years of qualifying service. 2003 Petitioner filed a Departmental Appeal on 31 7 2003 to withdraw his retirement order but his appeal was rejected, the petitioner preferred the appeal before Sindh Service T, saying that 25 For retirement upon completion of the qualifying service of the year, this option was not voluntary, but the rigorous service tribunal allowed the appeal and the appeal was barred before the tribunal could qualify, even though the departmental appeal was banned. When it was not rejected. He also said that the applicant's use of the option for retirement was not voluntary but the petitioner filed a review petition against the Supreme Court decision under appeal filed by the university thereafter. It was said that the Supreme Court of the law immigration advocates contact from Alipur lawyer