Find a Lawyer

CHIEF MINISTER, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR AND 2 OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD ZIAUL HAQ, SUB-ENGINEER, HARIPUR

Section service Representatives of the Rehabilitation Department in the service Impact of misreading and non-reading of evidence Government employee was retired from employment on charges of embezzlement of public servants Service Tribunal allowed appeal and public servant Resigned from the job. Was it that the order passed on the basis of the inquiry officer's search and inquiry report had no legal value, given the position specified by the representatives of the department before the service tribunal, the legal inquiry officer alleged If you consider the answer to accept, he was convicted. Instead of praising the facts on record in a civil-employee dispute, it had no substance and the service tribunal, the matter was decided on the basis of the concession statement given by the department representatives, to the authority of the service tribunal. Failed to decide appeal in appropriate jurisdiction. Re-bone was found to be inaccurate and poor reading defects or evidence was brought on record in support of the charge, which was set aside by the service tribunal and compulsory retirement approved by the department The order was restored jobs for fresh advocates from Dinga lawyer