Find a Lawyer

GUL NOOR AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2b) Remedies for Evidence Exemption Statement, the trial court sentenced both defendants to life imprisonment and the Federal Shariat Court sentenced them through a trial court. But the sentence was reduced to ten years from the fact that the plea offered by the accused was that they could not be punished on the basis of the unauthorized statement of the legal status of the prosecution, there was no rule or practice that rape. There should be harmony in every case of the prosecution's statement in Dari. The accused's conviction for abduction and unnatural crime was based on the victim's straightforward statements, the medical evidence of his mother and his sister was in accordance with the confessional statements made by the accused persons, Failed. While adhering to the evidence of the record below, no one followed the principle of law and the Supreme Court did not, in the case of any weakness or wrongful action by the courts under the Supreme Court, Refusing to interfere with the conclusions reached by the source, while exercising the powers under Article 203 F (2B) of the Constitution, the appeal was denied. property advocates from Risalpur lawyer