Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD AND 22 OTHERS versus DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER AND ANOTHER

Section Re: Recovery of Recovery Benefits Government employees were ordered to be dismissed by the service tribunal, but returning benefits, terming the intervention period as extraordinary leave, were dismissed, but there was nothing available. Employees used to work anywhere useful during the relevant period. Therefore, it would be unfair and difficult to deprive them of the previous benefits of the period for which government employees were deprived of their jobs without any fault. Under the Punjab Government Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1975, any wrongdoing and their services were terminated without cause for any untimely and arbitrary acts of public servants. Due to the discontinuation of employment of public servants, the salaries of public servants will not be withheld for the duration of the intervention. Every right to recover their dues is allowed by the Supreme Court on appeal for change of appeal and all benefits returned to civil servants \ r \ n \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Kotli lawyer