ASAD MEHMOOD versus STATE
Section 497 (2) for the offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 bail, grant of further investigation, Section 164, CRP also did not state in its statement that the accused had entered it. He was not charged with the marriage contract, nor was he charged with adultery, nor was he forced to commit adultery, nor was he married to her. Who was married to him. The fact is that she was not recovered from the possession of the accused, but she returned to her home prior to the arrest of the accused, there was a reasonable basis for presenting the accused's case and in further inquiry, the accused was sent to jail bars. Was behind and no more. Further investigation requires that the suspects have no bona fide motive to stay behind bars for indefinite periods; the accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Mehmood Kot lawyer