Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHID versus REHMAT ALI

AIX, R 13 and Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Case The trial court's decision to remand the application by the applicants and to reject the former party order and invalid prosecution was affected by the trial court. The trial court's order did not affect the rights of the parties; the rights of the parties would be biased. If the application is either accepted or rejected by the court, then the court will not decide on the matter. Did not apply to the customary and judicial mind. The issue of the time allowed to decide only the application was a fact issue, which required that the recording of the evidence was not included in the scope of the case; it was decided that the legal aspect of the case was not accepted by the reviewing court. And he had set aside his order. Applicants filed by the applicants were barred from hoping that the cases on the basis of framing of applications on a single basis were d. For the question of facts whose recording and recording of the evidence needs to be examined and the application Voters have the right to set their case for conviction on a showing of a largely unreasonable cause, which the reviewing court did not even consider legal questions and accept the review. And the petition was dismissed without giving the applicants the opportunity to establish their case through appropriate and credible evidence; the reviewing court merely granted the order on the assumption that the trial court is to render its decision in the review case. , Use its jurisdiction in situations immigration advocates from Babri Banda lawyer