Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), sections 381 and 411 bail, denied the charge against the accused that he had served one-up service on the complainant's property and then drugged the driver and snatched the vehicle. Lee demanded money for the return of the straight vehicle. The accused recovered on identification of the accused was involved in many other similar cases The accused was accused in his statement before the political tehsildar, he confessed in the incident mentioned by the complainant and he was also involved in other cases. Confessed for which he was the accused. Although it has been alleged, it did not fall under Article 497 of the CR PC Prohibited Clause, but on this sole basis, the accused was not entitled to arbitrary relief from bail because he was involved in many other matters of the same nature. There was every possibility of repeating the same crime. During the investigation, it was also discovered that the accused was in the car with snatchers and car-driving gangs, which were heard by the trial court. The defendant's rigorous trial was brought before the trial court. The accused did not deserve any relief. The defendant's bail plea was dismissed. property advocate from Matiari lawyer